Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 22:18:51 -0400 (EDT) From: Zhihui Zhang <zzhang@cs.binghamton.edu> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: VOP_LEASE(...) or (void)VOP_LEASE(...)? Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.990513221012.15708A-100000@sol.cs.binghamton.edu>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
VOP_LEASE(...) always returns 0 so there is no actual need to check its
return value. But still it has a return value. So should we use
(void)VOP_LEASE(...) instead of just VOP_LEASE(...)?
BTW, I guess that the practice of modifying
default_vnodeop_p[VOFFSET(vop_lease)] in nfs_init() is a hack. Why do not
we use
{ &vop_lease_desc, (vop_t *) nqnfs_vop_lease_check },
instead of
{ &vop_lease_desc, (vop_t *) vop_null },
in nfsv2_vnodeop_entries[] in file nfs_vnops.c?
Thanks for any help.
--------------------------------------------------
Zhihui Zhang. Please visit http://www.freebsd.org
--------------------------------------------------
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.3.96.990513221012.15708A-100000>