Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 31 Jul 2021 23:39:45 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 257522] msdosfs rename(2) deadlock
Message-ID:  <bug-257522-227-VpbRoCahYK@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-257522-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-257522-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D257522

Konstantin Belousov <kib@FreeBSD.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |kib@FreeBSD.org

--- Comment #1 from Konstantin Belousov <kib@FreeBSD.org> ---
msdosfs_rename() has the same issue as was present in ufs_rename() long time
ago.

First, relookup() cannot be used while any vnode is locked.  Instead, speci=
al
non-sleeping variant of msdosfs_lookup() needs to be made available and app=
lied
there.  It is already coded (dd_ino !=3D NULL for msdosfs_lookup_() I belie=
ve),
just needs to be exposed and applied.

Another issue is that function prologue must not use sleepable vn_lock()
when owning any other vnode lock.

Mostly, it needs to mimic the structure of ufs_rename() for acquiring all
three or four locks.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-257522-227-VpbRoCahYK>