Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 11:47:17 -0500 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Cc: svn-src-projects@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Dimitry Andric <dim@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r275122 - in projects/clang350-import: contrib/ipfilter contrib/llvm/lib/Target/Sparc/AsmParser contrib/llvm/lib/Target/Sparc/Disassembler contrib/llvm/lib/Target/Sparc/InstPrinter cont... Message-ID: <1739096.Nn18UPux8P@ralph.baldwin.cx> In-Reply-To: <20141201160334.GA84795@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <201411261436.sAQEa5v1084618@svn.freebsd.org> <5196246.smYqWMH2Lk@ralph.baldwin.cx> <20141201160334.GA84795@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday, December 01, 2014 08:03:34 AM Steve Kargl wrote: > On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 09:05:32AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > > On Wednesday, November 26, 2014 02:36:05 PM Dimitry Andric wrote: > > > Author: dim > > > Date: Wed Nov 26 14:36:04 2014 > > > New Revision: 275122 > > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/275122 > > > > > > Log: > > > After some horrible wrestling with Subversion's worthless merge > > > implementation, merge ^/head r275078 through r275117. > > > > > > Note that all the extraneous mergeinfo is there because Subversion > > > created it. I'll hopefully be able to remove it again when merging > > > back > > > to head. > > > > To be honest, for merging back to HEAD, I'd probably just do it by hand. > > We've been burned in the past by svn thinking it should copy modified > > files from the projects branch into HEAD instead of doing a merge thus > > losing history in HEAD. Probably what I would recommend is trying to do > > a merge, but reading the diff very carefully to ensure no modified files > > are added wholesale and then explicitly remove any mergeinfo before > > comitting (assuming you will only do a single merge at the end in which > > case the mergeinfo would be useless anyway) > > Isn't this backwards? The initial commit (and testing) should be > done in HEAD, and once it is proven to work, the commit is then > merged into the branches. This is for a projects branch (such as the one here where dim@ is testing the clang3.5 import), not for stable branches. For stable branches, yes changes must go through HEAD first. -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1739096.Nn18UPux8P>