Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 23:23:10 +0100 From: Eivind Eklund <eivind@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Robert Nordier <rnordier@nordier.com> Cc: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: -Werror Message-ID: <19990119232309.B52012@bitbox.follo.net> In-Reply-To: <199901192134.XAA19822@ceia.nordier.com>; from Robert Nordier on Tue, Jan 19, 1999 at 11:34:04PM %2B0200 References: <199901192108.IAA05382@godzilla.zeta.org.au> <199901192134.XAA19822@ceia.nordier.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jan 19, 1999 at 11:34:04PM +0200, Robert Nordier wrote: > Bruce Evans wrote: > > > People are already committing code that should be caught by -Werror: > > > > ../../netinet/if_ether.c: In function `arpresolve': ../../netinet/if_ether.c:330: warning: `la' might be used uninitialized in this function > > `la' _is_ used uninitialized in this function. > > Last I heard, folks intent on establishing -Werror as a default > option were being threatened with mayhem or worse. > > Is the point that we are nevertheless required to act "as if", at > least as far as new code is concerned? I'm planning on keeping compiling at least one of my trees with -Werror. This mean that the warnings will be fixed at _some_ level - either only locally in my tree, or globally if reasonable. I'm also thinking of whether an automated notifier would be useful (with Cc: to jkh, of course, as it was jkh that vetoed adding it to bsd.kern.mk ;-) Eivind. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990119232309.B52012>