Date: Tue, 19 Mar 1996 16:02:13 -0700 From: Nate Williams <nate@sri.MT.net> To: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> Cc: nate@sri.MT.net (Nate Williams), nate@sneezy.sri.com, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GAS question Message-ID: <199603192302.QAA05472@rocky.sri.MT.net> In-Reply-To: <199603192250.PAA24984@phaeton.artisoft.com> References: <199603192229.PAA05271@rocky.sri.MT.net> <199603192250.PAA24984@phaeton.artisoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Terry Lambert writes: > > Irrelevant. You are arguing that FreeBSD has no decent IDE, and the > > arguement is that we do have a decent one. And it's free. > > XEmacs itself is simply insufficient. > > How do I redock button-bars? > > Where is the button for "books online"? Tools. > Where are the buttons for "New Menu", "New Dialog", "New Cursor", > "New Icon", "New Bitmap", "New Toolbar", "New Accelerator", "New > String Table", "New Version", or "Component Gallery"? Those *aren't* part of the IDE. They are part of a graphical application development tool, but not an IDE. Turbo Pascal was the original IDE on the PC, and it had none of the things you mentioned. > Being able to compile and trace errors is a *tiny* part of an IDE... Being able to grab stuff off the button-bar is *NOT* part of an IDE. Arguing with you is useless because when people refute the points you make, you change the topic or the rules. If I continue, somehow this will all boil down to an arguement for VM86() mode, and I don't want to even hear that again. :) Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199603192302.QAA05472>