Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 20 May 2005 07:29:24 +0000 (UTC)
From:      "Wilhelm B. Kloke" <wb@arb-phys.uni-dortmund.de>
To:        freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Actual benefits of amd64 over i386
Message-ID:  <slrnd8r4h3.285v.wb@yorikke.arb-phys.uni-dortmund.de>
References:  <BEA97082.3CD55%michael.hopkins@hopkins-research.com> <42842F46.9040608@samsco.org> <4284FD37.2070009@jonny.eng.br> <20050519054630.GC68698@dragon.NUXI.org> <428CC670.50002@jonny.eng.br>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
João Carlos Mendes Luís <jonny@jonny.eng.br> schrieb:
>
>     Would these benefits outcome the losses caused by bigger binaries?
> Isn't it possible to use 64 bit registers in a 32 bit segment?  Just
> like i386 segments, where one could define the default register size...

I have made the experience, that the same piece of software (Algol68G
interpreter) has had about 10% performance gain in amd64 mode over i386
on the same machine. I don't have the figure about the increase in size
at hand.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?slrnd8r4h3.285v.wb>