Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 08:37:11 +0000 From: "sepherosa_gmail.com (Sepherosa Ziehau)" <phabric-noreply@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: [Differential] D5872: tcp: Don't prematurely drop receiving-only connections Message-ID: <0816d5d4d4f59b777cd9a31a83d80a88@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <differential-rev-PHID-DREV-5vu7wrfibtoing77xfvt-req@FreeBSD.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
sepherosa_gmail.com added a comment. In https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5872#130173, @mike-karels.net wrote: > I disagree; congestion is congestion, not "congestion for everyone but me". I'd prefer to leave the cwnd change until it is replaced by something more modern. We probably can leave the cwnd resetting to later rexmt timeout or possible later fast retransmit (I think fast retransmit could kick in under some cases, if ENOBUFS happened); instead of resetting the cwnd immediately upon ENOBUFS. REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5872 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: sepherosa_gmail.com, network, glebius, adrian, delphij, decui_microsoft.com, honzhan_microsoft.com, howard0su_gmail.com, freebsd-net-list, lstewart, hiren, jtl, transport Cc: gnn, mike-karels.net, jtlhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0816d5d4d4f59b777cd9a31a83d80a88>