Date: Sat, 09 Oct 1999 18:51:20 +0200 From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@scc.nl> To: stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: merging current's jail functionality to stable Message-ID: <37FF7288.288EEBF6@scc.nl> References: <19991009100231S.nectar@nectar.com>, <19991009160651.314441D87@bone.nectar.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jacques Vidrine wrote: > > [[ replying to your own message is fun ]] > = Don't change suser, but bring in the rest of the changes needed > for jail (add suser_xxx and update the 16 or so files that need > the new semantics). This means that suser in -STABLE and -CURRENT > are still different (as it is today), but it puts of breaking > binary compatibility until 4.0-RELEASE. > > This didn't occur to me earlier, mostly because I would like > the suser from -CURRENT to be merged into -STABLE. Strictly > speaking, this isn't necessary to support jail. To approach this from a different angle: How long will 3.x be -stable and can we afford to wait that long for jail to be a -stable feature? -- Marcel Moolenaar mailto:marcel@scc.nl SCC Internetworking & Databases http://www.scc.nl/ The FreeBSD project mailto:marcel@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?37FF7288.288EEBF6>