Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1998 12:15:06 -0700 From: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au> To: John Fieber <jfieber@indiana.edu> Cc: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>, emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Running Sybase... Message-ID: <199809251915.MAA00798@dingo.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 25 Sep 1998 11:08:13 CDT." <Pine.BSF.4.02A.9809251052460.1314-100000@fallout.campusview.indiana.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Thu, 24 Sep 1998, Mike Smith wrote: > > > You're definitely using the standard kdump - getdomainname is syscall > > 162, but under Linux that's nanosleep(), and what you're seeing there > > looks about right for an idle applications. > > Ahh, things make much more sense now with linux_kdump! 8) > So now the question is which is easier: moving to 3.0 which has > nanosleep() or moving nanosleep() to 2.2.7. Since the former > will happen regardless, I'm thinking that will be the easier > route...especially since I'm a novice at kernel hacking. Feh. The kernel's just a big program with a bad C library. Still, take your pick. At the very least, I'd really like to see the ioctl changes you made get committed. 8) -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199809251915.MAA00798>