Date: Sat, 1 May 1999 10:49:02 -0400 (EDT) From: Robert Watson <robert@cyrus.watson.org> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> Cc: Soren Schmidt <sos@freebsd.dk>, garbanzo@hooked.net, jbryant@unix.tfs.net, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ep0 *UTP* Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990501104630.1322C-100000@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <xzpogk5vzn6.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 1 May 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Soren Schmidt <sos@freebsd.dk> writes: > > [...] > > There are lots of better cards out there, but stating that the 3c509 > > doesn't work, is totally out in the dark... > > Well, excuse me for breathing. I'll just take your word, and dismiss > the problems I've had with flaky 3c509s (about two thirds of those > I've encountered have been flaky) as mere hallucinations. Well, if it's any reassurance at all, a friend of mine recently switched to FreeBSD from Andrew Linux, and the 3c509 was flaky under Linux, but seems to work fine under FreeBSD. Given past experiences, I advised him not to put it under too high a load, but since it's just a crash machine anyway.. They were really amused when the FreeBSD boot sequence announced that the card was known buggy and something should be done about it, and they commented that that was exactly right and they were pretty impressed. Even more so when the card worked for a change. Robert N Watson robert@fledge.watson.org http://www.watson.org/~robert/ PGP key fingerprint: AF B5 5F FF A6 4A 79 37 ED 5F 55 E9 58 04 6A B1 Carnegie Mellon University http://www.cmu.edu/ TIS Labs at Network Associates, Inc. http://www.tis.com/ Safeport Network Services http://www.safeport.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.990501104630.1322C-100000>