Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2025 03:51:18 +0000 From: Graham Perrin <grahamperrin@gmail.com> To: Guido Falsi <madpilot@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports-list freebsd <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: editors/ghostwriter 24.12.0 versus x11/kde5 Message-ID: <0648307d-61cc-44f5-8ebe-7d8a9a109734@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <aee070ad-cf40-4f03-bc4a-afae2c83b227@FreeBSD.org> References: <b35dfe57-ca3f-4ee8-a5b8-b0fb701fa45d@gmail.com> <20250102015351.9fdbbf3dd4142d6d6c783060@dec.sakura.ne.jp> <aee070ad-cf40-4f03-bc4a-afae2c83b227@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 01/01/2025 18:50, Guido Falsi wrote: > … The port can only reflect upstream development. I held some updates > in the last few months because those were crashing for me and I was > not able to fix it. This version is not crashing. Thanks, as always. (I was careful to _not_ make a bug report.) > … Anyway the ports tree is open source, nothing stops anyone from > proposing (with himself as maintainer) a new port for the old version > calling it "ghostwriter-qt5" or whatever. True :)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0648307d-61cc-44f5-8ebe-7d8a9a109734>