Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 11:40:48 -0700 (MST) From: "Chad R. Larson" <chad@DCFinc.com> To: vallo@matti.ee Cc: msmith@FreeBSD.ORG, steve@sse0691.bri.hp.com, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4-stable won't boot Message-ID: <200005251840.LAA29149@freeway.dcfinc.com> In-Reply-To: <20000525194643.B532@myhakas.matti.ee> from Vallo Kallaste at "May 25, 0 07:46:43 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Did you take all of them out at once? The AUTO_EOI options are BAD and
> > EVIL and we should _not_ be letting people use them.
>
> Then please document it in the LINT, I remember that on the first time I
> did custom kernel those EOI options seemed quite useful to include in
> kernel config. After a while following the lists they didn't seem so...
As with most things, absolutes are rare.
My kernel config files on my 2.2.x systems have contained
options "AUTO_EOI_1"
options "AUTO_EOI_2"
for ever, without problem.
What makes that e-vile?
-crl
--
Chad R. Larson (CRL15) 602-953-1392 Brother, can you paradigm?
chad@dcfinc.com chad@larsons.org larson1@home.net
DCF, Inc. - 14623 North 49th Place, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254-2207
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200005251840.LAA29149>