Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 23:42:00 +0100 From: Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no> To: Snob Art Genre <benedict@echonyc.com>, Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: egcs and -stable Message-ID: <19980217234200.64455@follo.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.96.980217173007.8019A-100000@echonyc.com>; from Snob Art Genre on Tue, Feb 17, 1998 at 05:32:03PM -0500 References: <199802172226.PAA04230@usr09.primenet.com> <Pine.GSO.3.96.980217173007.8019A-100000@echonyc.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Feb 17, 1998 at 05:32:03PM -0500, Snob Art Genre wrote: > On Tue, 17 Feb 1998, Terry Lambert wrote: > > > The FSF 2.8.0 is better than the Cygnus 2.8.0. > > So I should use gcc28 in ports/lang instead of egcs? OK . . . how well > will that work as my system compiler? Does it work for making the world? > How about the kernel? Etc. EGCS is bazar. FSF gcc is still cathedral. I'm fairly certain egcs hold a large part of the future for gcc (though much of the development there might be merged back to FSF gcc). Eivind, who notice that FSF once more has had a spin-off product due to its long release-cycles. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980217234200.64455>