Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 01:43:23 -0800 From: David Schultz <das@FreeBSD.ORG> To: "Eugene M. Kim" <ab@astralblue.net> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/fs/unionfs union_vnops.c Message-ID: <20031117094323.GB52046@VARK.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <3FB87E09.40904@astralblue.net> References: <200311140823.hAE8NDAb005015@repoman.freebsd.org> <20031114105746.M497@ganymede.hub.org> <3FB87E09.40904@astralblue.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003, "Eugene M. Kim ??" wrote: > Does this move unionfs into the `safe for general consumption' region, > or is this particular problem just a tip of an iceberg? Aside from support for FIFOs and other special files and a few other nits, it seems to behave pretty well. On the other hand, there are still a number of underlying problems that I don't have time to address. I suggest that you try it out and determine whether it works well enough for your purposes. Check the bug database before reporting any problems, though. (Note also that several of the relevant bugs have been prematurely closed recently.)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031117094323.GB52046>