Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 15:35:28 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Where to put include files (was: cvs commit: src Makefile.inc1) Message-ID: <20010520153528.B7358@sunbay.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0105200154390.36925-100000@besplex.bde.org>; from bde@zeta.org.au on Sun, May 20, 2001 at 01:57:45AM %2B1000 References: <20010518175335.A90576@sunbay.com> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0105200154390.36925-100000@besplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 01:57:45AM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Fri, 18 May 2001, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>
> > > sbin/mount_null/Makefile
> > > sbin/mount_portal/Makefile
> > > sbin/mount_umap/Makefile
> > > sbin/mount_union/Makefile
> > >
> > FS headers should go into /usr/include/fs/<fs>fs.h, one per
> > each filesystem.
>
> <fs> without a slash? This isn't so clear. Lots of headers may be
> needed for <fs>_fsck.
>
Hmm, right.
Actually, I just want a consistency here, no matter which way we choose,
so we could get rif of all bogus -I${.CURDIR}/.../sys lines in Makefiles.
Should we put all FS-related headers under /usr/include/fs/<fs>/*.h then?
That would imply moving src/sys/ufs to src/sys/fs/ufs so that we could
make `make SHARED=symlinks' work as well.
(Similarly for src/sys/miscfs -> src/sys/fs/miscfs.)
I'm not sure what impact on third-party software that would have.
Cheers,
--
Ruslan Ermilov Oracle Developer/DBA,
ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG,
ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer,
+380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine
http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010520153528.B7358>