Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 02 May 1999 00:31:55 +0900
From:      "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com>
To:        Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>
Cc:        Lars Fredriksen <lars@odin-corporation.com>, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: default route not set up??
Message-ID:  <372B1E6B.263A3B19@newsguy.com>
References:  <372A1AE6.4E2738D4@odin-corporation.com> <xzpn1zpvyup.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <372AF60B.E11A6989@newsguy.com> <xzpiuadvsgw.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> 
> > >     # Configure routing
> > >
> > >     if [ "x$defaultrouter" != "xNO" ] ; then
> > >             static_routes="default ${static_routes}"    # look here...
> > >             route_default="default ${defaultrouter}"
> > >     fi
> > >
> > >     # Set up any static routes.  This should be done before router discovery.
> > >     if [ "x${static_routes}" != "x" ]; then
> > >             for i in ${static_routes}; do               # ...and here
> > >                     eval route_args=\$route_${i}
> > >                     route add ${route_args}
> > >             done
> > >     fi
> >
> > Looking there, it *does* seem that there is a problem. defaultrouter
> > is only used to set route_default, which is *not* used. At least on
> > the code you quoted.
> 
> This is getting fun :) Look closer at the first line I commented, then
> at the loop, and especially the eval.

That's tricky, indeed. You should have commented the line below the
second line, not the second line. :-)

--
Daniel C. Sobral			(8-DCS)
dcs@newsguy.com
dcs@freebsd.org

	"Proof of Trotsky's farsightedness if that _none_ of his
predictions have come true yet."


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?372B1E6B.263A3B19>