Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 23:41:53 +0900 (JST) From: Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org> To: delphij@FreeBSD.org Cc: doc-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: www/en/releases/6.0R schedule.sgml Message-ID: <20051010.234153.21933676.hrs@allbsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20051009162747.GA51517@hub.freebsd.org> References: <200510091329.j99DT5Bv001028@repoman.freebsd.org> <20051009162747.GA51517@hub.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----Security_Multipart(Mon_Oct_10_23_41_53_2005_736)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Xin LI <delphij@FreeBSD.ORG> wrote in <20051009162747.GA51517@hub.freebsd.org>: de> On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 01:29:05PM +0000, Hiroki Sato wrote: de> > Log: de> > Document the actual date when RELENG_6_0 branch is created. de> de> Is it time to also bump RELENG_6_0 to 6.0-RC1, and RELENG_6 to 6.0-STABLE de> or 6.0-PRERELEASE? I think that's the traditional practice... Well, updating newvers.sh was done on the same day, but this date does not mean RELENG_6 unfreezed. The unfreezing does not always happen at the same time. -- | Hiroki SATO ----Security_Multipart(Mon_Oct_10_23_41_53_2005_736)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDSn2xTyzT2CeTzy0RAlkdAKC1lY1Sg8hyB6ADnvckTSyrMi114ACfU0o8 oPSP57W9eVkUwhZt17rXB8o= =knO+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart(Mon_Oct_10_23_41_53_2005_736)----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051010.234153.21933676.hrs>