Date: 22 Dec 1998 19:08:08 +0100 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> To: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>, freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: JDK1.1.7.V98-12-21 released Message-ID: <xzpr9tst5h3.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: Nate Williams's message of "Tue, 22 Dec 1998 09:07:04 -0700" References: <199812220541.WAA04451@mt.sri.com> <xzpyao0tcr4.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <199812221535.IAA06007@mt.sri.com> <xzpu2yotbxi.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <199812221607.JAA06153@mt.sri.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> writes:
> > > > 1) install the source code under ${PREFIX}/jdk1.1.7/src instead of
> > > > leaving it packed
> > > This is how Sun distributes it. The sources are (IMO) not much good to
> > > have around, especially unpacked. It would also make the distribution
> > > *much* bigger.
> > No it wouldn't. The sources are already there. It would only add one
> > line to the Makefile (and a dependency on unzip).
> Sure it would. Each file takes up a minimum of 4K, and since there are
> so many of them 'bundling' them together is better than not.
Ah. It doesn't make the *distribution* bigger, it makes the *installed
port* bigger.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpr9tst5h3.fsf>