Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 15:37:22 +0300 From: "CBuH." <479001601@mail.ru> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: packages system Message-ID: <200403141537.23143.479001601@mail.ru>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello again, all.
Consider a bad package management system... or .. I don't know!
1) Why, if the package P depends on A-1.2.3 and I manually `pkg_add=20
A-1.2.3_1`, the package P still look for A-1.2.3 and don't want to install?
Suppose version of A-1.2.3_X includes the minor patches to version 1.2.3. S=
o=20
why such an issue is held?
2) Why If I have pkg_add-ed packages C-1.2.3 and C-1.2.4 and later hoped to=
=20
pkg_update C-1.2.4 ....... it found dis-MD5'n in +CONTENTS's files (I=20
understand why) but deletes any way them and C-1.2.3, then pkg_add (in=20
script) C-1.2.4,... but _does_not_ resign +REQUIRED_BY file for C-1.2.4 fro=
m=20
C-1.2.3 and does not resample their (pkgs from +REQUIRED_BY) +REQUIRES file=
s?
Or I have wrong seeing of the packages world? Direct me right.
Sorry for *may be* strong speach.
=2D --=20
CBuH. CG[CX] XVyGYjau 479001600(at)mail.ru, ICQ#70929413
GnuPG(PGP) public key is: http://www.vinnied.narod.ru/pubkey.asc
http://www.vinnied.narod.ru
=09
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFAVFID5Cj3gqxcdCoRAq4LAKCCAgmm0Lmotaj64rom8Ixc+OneaQCeNydp
UK5PRWnItueF/w5Bv5D3RTc=3D
=3DtRvP
=2D----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200403141537.23143.479001601>