Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 21 Jul 2005 08:42:39 +0100 (BST)
From:      Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
To:        David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com>
Cc:        freebsd-chat@freebsd.org, fullermd@over-yonder.net
Subject:   RE: Software patents and FreeBSD
Message-ID:  <Pine.GSO.4.62.0507210841200.28160@mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <MDEHLPKNGKAHNMBLJOLKKECGFFAB.davids@webmaster.com>
References:  <MDEHLPKNGKAHNMBLJOLKKECGFFAB.davids@webmaster.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, David Schwartz wrote:

> 	The standard of proof in civil cases is simply a preponderance of the
> evidence. Establishing that an idea is not obvious is evidence that two
> people didn't develop it independently.

I'm sure Newton would love this definition; Leibniz wouldn't.

-- 
jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/
Tel +44 (0)117 9287088 or 3317661   http://ioctl.org/jan/
"NOP" is a trivial implementation of an executable Z subset.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.62.0507210841200.28160>