Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 20:53:23 +0200 From: Vallo Kallaste <vallo@matti.ee> To: "Chad R. Larson" <chad@DCFinc.com> Cc: msmith@FreeBSD.ORG, steve@sse0691.bri.hp.com, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4-stable won't boot Message-ID: <20000525205323.A1234@myhakas.matti.ee> In-Reply-To: <200005251840.LAA29149@freeway.dcfinc.com>; from chad@DCFinc.com on Thu, May 25, 2000 at 11:40:48AM -0700 References: <20000525194643.B532@myhakas.matti.ee> <200005251840.LAA29149@freeway.dcfinc.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, May 25, 2000 at 11:40:48AM -0700, "Chad R. Larson" <chad@DCFinc.com> wrote: > As with most things, absolutes are rare. > > My kernel config files on my 2.2.x systems have contained > > options "AUTO_EOI_1" > options "AUTO_EOI_2" > > for ever, without problem. > What makes that e-vile? That's right. I had those options turned on for my 2.2.2-2.2.7 system without problems, later heard the bad from lists. Now, I don't even remember what it did, perhaps Mike can say. My point was that if these options are so bad usually and sometimes definitely useful then document them in straightforward manner so no more confusion can happen. -- Vallo Kallaste vallo@matti.ee To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000525205323.A1234>