Date: Tue, 3 Dec 1996 14:46:56 +1100 (EDT) From: Darren Reed <avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au> To: davem@jenolan.rutgers.edu (David S. Miller) Cc: dyson@freebsd.org, dennis@etinc.com, kpneal@pobox.com, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: TCP/IP bandwidth bragging Message-ID: <199612030346.TAA04796@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <199612030133.UAA18131@jenolan.caipgeneral> from "David S. Miller" at Dec 2, 96 08:33:44 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In some mail from David S. Miller, sie said: [...] > You can say whatever you want. And whats more, I am told often by > disgruntled Solaris performance engineers that lmbench is "bush > league", that is perfectly fine with me. My response is, if it is so > bush leage, why is it so difficult for these systems to get better > numbers than Linux? Stay down. > > And watch out, I have gigabit ethernet and FDDI coming very soon as > well. SGI cannot even touch my bandwidth and latencies over 100baseT. > > ---------------------------------------------//// > Yow! 11.26 MB/s remote host TCP bandwidth & //// > 199 usec remote TCP latency over 100Mb/s //// > ethernet. Beat that! //// > -----------------------------------------////__________ o > David S. Miller, davem@caip.rutgers.edu /_____________/ / // /_/ >< Why is it that whenever you pop your head up onto NetBSD or FreeBSD you look like a jerk waving the Linux flag and trying to cause trouble ? Tell me, does Linux implement STREAMS in the kernel with a properly stacked network implementation, using DLPI and TLPI with fine grain mutexes and locks ?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199612030346.TAA04796>