Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 29 Jun 2009 04:18:37 +0400
From:      Anonymous <swell.k@gmail.com>
To:        Ryan Stone <rysto32@gmail.com>
Cc:        Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, Hans Ottevanger <hansot@iae.nl>, Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@freebsd.org>, Robert Noland <rnoland@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: panic on acpi_cpu_c1()
Message-ID:  <86vdmfnb8i.fsf@gmail.com>
References:  <20090628034654.bdb728c4.nork@FreeBSD.org> <4A47A681.3040100@iae.nl> <86bpo8b3y8.fsf@gmail.com> <1246220306.1759.43.camel@balrog.2hip.net> <20090628202739.GQ2884@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <1246230266.1759.45.camel@balrog.2hip.net> <bc2d970906281619g51e65aecn812071da6ebf5d20@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ryan Stone <rysto32@gmail.com> writes:

> Is the drm module getting loaded by the bootloader, or might a startup
> script be doing it? If the module gets loaded later in the boot
> process that could account for the difference.

In my case with nouveau drm kernel panics either when
- drm loaded with kernel at boot time
- drm compiled in
And panic message either about acpi_cpu_c1 or sched_idletd. I'm not sure
why it changes sometimes.

The kernel doesn't panic if I load drm later in boot process after kernel
initialized, e.g. in single user mode or multiuser mode.

>
> Ryan



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86vdmfnb8i.fsf>