Date: Thu, 18 Nov 1999 18:20:25 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> Cc: Alex Zepeda <jazepeda@pacbell.net>, Andreas Klemm <andreas@klemm.gtn.com>, David Greenman <dg@root.com>, Sean Eric Fagan <sef@kithrup.com>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PATCH for testing Message-ID: <199911190120.SAA29399@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 18 Nov 1999 17:04:20 PST." <199911190104.RAA88682@apollo.backplane.com> References: <199911190104.RAA88682@apollo.backplane.com> <Pine.BSF.4.10.9911172341110.397-100000@localhost> <199911181924.MAA27434@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199911190104.RAA88682@apollo.backplane.com> Matthew Dillon writes: : I am all for removing -e, but I don't really like the idea of making : it optional nor do I like the idea of trying to maintain the capability : for the user's own processes - that simply makes the code even more : complex then it already is. The danger is that the option exists in : the first place. I'm not for removing -e. It is useful to root for debugging. If ps can get this info from procfs, procfs could effectively enforce this restriction. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199911190120.SAA29399>