Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 05:54:28 -0600 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org> To: Stijn Hoop <stijn@win.tue.nl> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make release without a lot of the base system Message-ID: <20030327115428.GF98283@madman.celabo.org> In-Reply-To: <20030327111440.GJ93053@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> References: <20030327111440.GJ93053@pcwin002.win.tue.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 12:14:40PM +0100, Stijn Hoop wrote: > First, should even kerberos be built with the NO* options above? No, it should not. Defining NOCRYPT or NO_OPENSSL will prevent the kerberosIV directory from being entered during the build. [...] > Second, I have tried adding MAKE_KERBEROS4=no to make.conf but that doesn't > appear to make a difference. What's the correct option in /etc/make.conf to > skip building kerberos 4 and 5? Don't do that. The correct option is not to define MAKE_KERBEROS[45] at all. The value does not matter ... if it is defined, it will be read as `make it please'. I would guess that your flags aren't getting propogated as you think. *shrug* Cheers, -- Jacques A. Vidrine <nectar@celabo.org> http://www.celabo.org/ NTT/Verio SME . FreeBSD UNIX . Heimdal Kerberos jvidrine@verio.net . nectar@FreeBSD.org . nectar@kth.se
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030327115428.GF98283>