Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 22:23:27 +0100 From: Vincent Jardin <vjardin@wanadoo.fr> To: "Sam Leffler" <sam@errno.com>, <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Recursive encapsulation could panic the Kernel Message-ID: <3DF63117003CB51E@mel-rta9.wanadoo.fr> (added by postmaster@wanadoo.fr) In-Reply-To: <050301c2a5f2$fc52aae0$52557f42@errno.com> References: <3DF62DBD0032C2ED@mel-rta6.wanadoo.fr> <050301c2a5f2$fc52aae0$52557f42@errno.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > In -current mbufs can be tagged (see m_tag* in sys/mbuf.h); this'll let you > do what you want. I've been slow to MFC them to -stable because there are > some issues with copying packet headers that I want to resolve first. > I thought about m_ext too. I agree that the m_tag looks better. However, how do you plan to solve this copy of packets ? Moreover, when the lower layer is an IPv4 or IPv6 stack, it would be nice to be able to send back an ICMP Unreachable and/or TTL expired. ;-) Vincent To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3DF63117003CB51E>