Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 00:33:36 -0700 From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@tristatelogic.com> To: "freebsd-security@freebsd.org" <freebsd-security@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Intel CPU CVE Issue: CVE-2022-21166/CVE-2022-21125/CVE-2022-21123 Message-ID: <41717.1655451216@segfault.tristatelogic.com> In-Reply-To: <90e55cbc-a0f7-7220-3759-e05dee2daaf9@inbox.lv>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <90e55cbc-a0f7-7220-3759-e05dee2daaf9@inbox.lv>, John Long <codeblue@inbox.lv> wrote: >1st of all, my comment was because of your post but was not directed at >you. Sorry if that was unclear. > >2nd of all, great that they give advice. Not so great that people have >to actually do the work. This costs everybody *besides Intel* a lot of >money and there is no end in sight. > >How about if Intel gives refunds to people afflicted by their defective >products and pays remediation costs to software projects similarly >afflicted? Maybe that would give them incentive to do a better job with >the junk they're selling. There's neither any need nor any point to being rude to the guy. He just asked a couple of simple simple questions. It's not his job to issue refunds for Intel's broken & insecure processors. (He doesn't even work for Intel.) Regards, rfg
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?41717.1655451216>