Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 23:02:37 +0100 From: Wilko Bulte <wb@freebie.xs4all.nl> To: Scott Long <scottl@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_sig.c Message-ID: <20041103220237.GB37480@freebie.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <41880075.70309@freebsd.org> References: <200410290824.i9T8Oflr047896@repoman.freebsd.org> <200410291338.50383.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <20041029234823.GW24892@elvis.mu.org> <200411011429.38840.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <20041102214014.GA54727@hub.freebsd.org> <41880075.70309@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Nov 02, 2004 at 02:47:33PM -0700, Scott Long wrote.. > David O'Brien wrote: > >On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 02:29:38PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > > > >>On Friday 29 October 2004 07:48 pm, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > >> > >>>I made 3-4 requestss, each one had an ACK that said, "sorry, right > >>>on it!" > >>> > >>>It's just not acceptable. > >> > >>Are you volunteering to be an re@ secretary ala wilko@? > > > > > >Why does every group now need a secretary? Maybe we just need more > >members on RE@ that are very active. > > With all due respect, I'd like the members of the release engineering > team to decide what is best for them, and have less armchair > quarterbacking of what others think we need. I would just like to say this: don't overengineer what aint broken. Sjeez.. it is hardly a Supreme Court worthy case that re@ forgot to update some stupid web page is it? Wouldn't a normal, if need be public, reply to the automated reminder email have been sufficient to get that fixed? -- Wilko Bulte wilko@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041103220237.GB37480>