Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 22:42:47 +0100 From: Stefan <roijers@iae.nl> To: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za> Cc: security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Abnormal behaviour of "established" rule with ipfw? Message-ID: <4.1.20010215223737.00948470@pop.iae.nl> In-Reply-To: <11651.982225965@axl.fw.uunet.co.za> References: <Your message of "Wed, 14 Feb 2001 21:17:18 %2B0100." <4.1.20010214211242.0094ac90@pop.iae.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 10:32 15-2-01 +0200, you wrote: > > >Do you use any bridging between lo0 and another interface? No, I'm using an almost 'default' configuration according the book. Using natd makes no difference (tested with and without) I think it has something to do with the combination of 4.1-Release and the patch The patch I think has been created and tested with 4.2-Release Just having some friends verifying this.. I'm going to upgrade to 4.2-release with patches, so I can see if the problem then still exists. Thanks for answering, Stefan > >Ciao, >Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.1.20010215223737.00948470>