Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 00:42:14 +0800 From: "h0444lp6" <h0444lp6@student.hu-berlin.de> To: <matrix@altima.net>, <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: interrogation Message-ID: <004e01c318a5$83c8a0e0$9bc3148d@kojo> In-Reply-To: <200305111513.AA1341325882@altima.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
aewm++ and pwm both run perfectly on my P200, 64MB. I prefer aewm++ since it looks cleaner (at least I think so), but pwm is more configurable (appearance). If you decide on aewm++ get aewm_goodies from http://sapphire.sourceforge.net/, especially ae_fspanel is interesting. Aewm++ and ae_fspanel require about 2MB RAM. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of matrix@altima.net Sent: Monday, May 12, 2003 3:13 AM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: interrogation which Windows Manager do you reccomend me I'm on a p1 233mhz MMX 64M Ram 4 gig harddisk thank you for your answer _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?004e01c318a5$83c8a0e0$9bc3148d>