Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2018 07:57:05 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: virtualization@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 225791] ena driver causing kernel panics on AWS EC2 Message-ID: <bug-225791-27103-bIAFtZeehQ@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-225791-27103@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-225791-27103@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D225791 --- Comment #11 from Richard Paul <richard@primarysite.net> --- Hi Colin, I read the article about these drives earlier this year thanks, (p.s. is th= is more usable now in 11.2 or are we still waiting on an ability to hot remove drives), specifically on this test instance, no, I haven't we did do this on the original C5 server when we wanted to replace an IO2 drive which was cos= ting us a fortune, and had to schedule some down time to detach it. But in terms of the instance that I'm testing no, I didn't mess about with = the volumes. However, thinking about this, have you tried testing with a larger number of EBS volumes attached? And tested with load going to most of them at the same time? We have, UFS root vol, 2x mirrored ZFS for DB, 1x ZFS for logs, 1x ZFS local backups vol. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-225791-27103-bIAFtZeehQ>