Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 02:33:46 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org> To: Archie Cobbs <archie@dellroad.org> Cc: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>, "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>, grog@freebsd.org, FreeBSD-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Do we still need portmap(8)? Message-ID: <20021007233346.GB1408@hades.hell.gr> In-Reply-To: <200210072214.g97MEe5M058451@arch20m.dellroad.org> References: <3DA1F203.6CD50B5C@mindspring.com> <200210072214.g97MEe5M058451@arch20m.dellroad.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2002-10-07 15:14, Archie Cobbs <archie@dellroad.org> wrote:
> Anything that gets overwritten during the normal install process
> is already taken care of. We're just trying to get rid of files
> which are not installed by 'make installword' but used to be once.
>
> I.e., if a file is not installed by 'make installworld' then by
> definition it's not required for a correctly functioning system.
This might cause problems with ports that ``overwrite'' base-system
files. I hate ports the idea of ports writing anything outside of
${LOCALBASE}, but we already have some of those IIRC.
Giorgos.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021007233346.GB1408>