Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 00:28:22 +0800 From: Xin LI <delphij@frontfree.net> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org>, delphij@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/comms/zmtx-zmrx Makefile distinfo Message-ID: <20050706162822.GA51156@frontfree.net> In-Reply-To: <20050706155800.GA81595@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200507061204.j66C4nb2000830@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050706153457.GA80945@xor.obsecurity.org> <1120664717.96367.9.camel@hood.oook.cz> <20050706154950.GA81400@xor.obsecurity.org> <1120665126.96367.12.camel@hood.oook.cz> <20050706155800.GA81595@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Kris, On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 11:58:00AM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 05:52:06PM +0200, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > > Kris Kennaway p??e v st 06. 07. 2005 v 11:49 -0400: > > > On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 05:45:17PM +0200, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > > > > Kris Kennaway p??e v st 06. 07. 2005 v 11:34 -0400: > > > > > On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 12:04:49PM +0000, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > > > > > > pav 2005-07-06 12:04:49 UTC [snip] > > > > > > PR: ports/82955 > > > > > > Submitted by: delphij > > > > >=20 > > > > > You forgot to summarize diffs. This is a particularly important > > > > > situation for it. > > > >=20 > > > > Yes. I just couldn't get hands on the old distfile. > > >=20 > > > You should not have committed it until you could, then. =20 > >=20 > > Then we would end up stucked with a lot of ports in checksum mismatch > > state. >=20 > Not "a lot", but perhaps some. This is of course better than blindly > committing a change that may be someone's attempt to introduce > malicious code into the ports tree, as has happened in the past. Since the patchset was submitted by I, so I think I should say something for pav@... I have diff'ed between the two archives so I'd say we won't worry about new malicious code to have been introduced at this time :-) > > > Did you ask the maintainer? > >=20 > > No. But the MAINTAINER=3D line was ports@FreeBSD.org, which means nobody cares about it. I think it's Ok to grab maintainership since I used this tool actively. There's no PR against this port after 5 weeks of the deprecation, and I just don't want it to be removed from the ports collection that early... Cheers, --=20 Xin LI <delphij frontfree net> http://www.delphij.net/ See complete headers for GPG key and other information. --LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCzAam/cVsHxFZiIoRAh3ZAJ9tZVaTCX3grDSwQOgIN92VwalLuACcC4aE JpFasLtTQ6KHdYXmRIeC1N0= =Rp4M -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050706162822.GA51156>