Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 31 Aug 2001 00:11:30 +0400 (MSD)
From:      .@babolo.ru
To:        stuyman@confusion.net (Laurence Berland)
Cc:        keith.stevenson@louisville.edu, bicknell@ufp.org, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Should URL's be pervasive.
Message-ID:  <200108302011.AAA10805@aaz.links.ru>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96.1010830084803.23544A-100000@euphoria.confusion.net> from "Laurence Berland" at "Aug 30, 1 08:49:04 am"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Laurence Berland writes:
> Optimally, you could write a urlsh or something, and leave everyone else
> alone.  The shell could do substitutions on URLs just like they do on
> wildcards etc, and the applications would not need to be rewritten, plus
> you wouldn't add bloat to those of us who don't want this in the system...
It is possible if interfaces of utilities is fully standartized.
For example -p flag in any command means port number.
Such as

mutt -l user -h host.domain

as legal alternative of

mutt user@host.domain

> Laurence
> 
> On Thu, 30 Aug 2001, Keith Stevenson wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 11:10:18AM -0400, Leo Bicknell wrote:
> > > 
> > > I ran into a pair of all too common annoyances this morning that
> > > got me thinking.  Via the magic of cut and paste I ended up with
> > > the following two sorts of command lines:
> > > 
> > > mutt mailto:bicknell@ufp.org
> > > traceroute http://www.ufp.org/
> > > 
> > > These of course come from the 'copy link location' available in
> > > most browsers.  When pasted into most Unix commands (with the
> > > exception of fetch and lynx, of course) the result is something
> > > that just doesn't work.  This got me thinking, should all commands
> > > know how to take an URL, and 'do the right thing'?  Could this
> > > be made easy by providing a standard URL parsing library that
> > > all commands could use for parsing?
> > 
> > Ick. If I wanted this kind of integration I would run Windows, KDE, or GNOME
> > instead of my nice, stable, predictable, lightweight desktop environment.
> > 
> > In my opinion, the "URLification" of the user environment would be a negative
> > unless there were a very easy way to turn it completely off.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > --Keith Stevenson--
> > 
> > -- 
> > Keith Stevenson
> > System Programmer - Data Center Services - University of Louisville
> > keith.stevenson@louisville.edu
> > GPG key fingerprint =  332D 97F0 6321 F00F 8EE7  2D44 00D8 F384 75BB 89AE
> > 
> > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
> > 
> 
> Laurence Berland
> http://www.isp.northwestern.edu
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
> 


-- 
@BABOLO      http://links.ru/

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200108302011.AAA10805>