Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 17:26:19 -0600 (CST) From: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> Cc: Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com>, Brian Behlendorf <brian@collab.net>, Roman Shterenzon <roman@xpert.com>, <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory: FreeBSD-SA-01:18.bind Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.31.0101311721500.563-100000@achilles.silby.com> In-Reply-To: <20010131151531.I26076@fw.wintelcom.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > If it breaks HUP, then not really. :) > > I'm not sure how bind handles restarts, but even if it exec(2)s over > itself it can track the fd open for its socket and shouldn't have to > rebind it. I don't see any complaints from 8.2.3 running -u bind -g bind when I HUP it here. (Well, ok, I see the can't create pidfile junk, but that's not critical IMHO.) Mike "Silby" Silbersack To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.31.0101311721500.563-100000>