Date: Fri, 8 May 2020 13:33:53 -0500
From: Eric van Gyzen <eric@vangyzen.net>
To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
Cc: freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: ${COMPILER_VERSION} < 40300
Message-ID: <fb67a035-eeb8-5ad5-9c19-750ddcbb7ae0@vangyzen.net>
In-Reply-To: <ce98f523-dd43-7e71-cef1-e5a803e8114d@FreeBSD.org>
References: <2f15c981-8846-ddef-6593-dadc14933cc5@vangyzen.net> <CANCZdfrKsnmbD5XOWZs%2BfVVs-5%2BJWE3k-D90PbiULX-uMUqoaw@mail.gmail.com> <ce98f523-dd43-7e71-cef1-e5a803e8114d@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5/8/20 1:22 PM, John Baldwin wrote: > I think Eric though was asking about <sys/cdefs.h> and the like. Actually, I was asking about makefile conditions, but this is still a good discussion to have. I'm in a cleanup mood. > (BTW, it would be good to know if it's at all useful to keep any of the > icc bits around.) Intel made a FreeBSD version of their 2016 compiler. https://software.intel.com/content/www/us/en/develop/articles/intel-system-studio-2016-for-freebsd.html That uses Clang as a front-end, so maybe some of the old icc bits can still go away. I still have a copy of that compiler, so I can test things as needed. Eric
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?fb67a035-eeb8-5ad5-9c19-750ddcbb7ae0>