Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 10:40:07 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SEC:ULarger NGROUPS_MAX in CURRENT ? Ready for 7.0-R ? Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.0.999.0708151039340.98070@qbhto.arg> In-Reply-To: <f9vc51$9vi$1@sea.gmane.org> References: <20070812114017.GA93036@obelix.dsto.defence.gov.au> <20070815104929.GJ11649@obelix.dsto.defence.gov.au> <f9vc51$9vi$1@sea.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007, Ivan Voras wrote:
> Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
>> Anyone ? rwatson@ ?
>
> AFAIK the only problem with this is that NFS will fail with larger
> number of groups, so (for those not using NFS) why not make the number
> of groups an item in kernel configurations and make a compile-time and
> module-load-time checks for this in the NFS code?
Sure, we look forward to reviewing your patches.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.0.999.0708151039340.98070>