Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 15:31:46 +0100 (BST) From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Gao=20Long?= <urgaolong@yahoo.com> To: David Johnson <david@usermode.org> Cc: freebsd-libh@freebsd.org Subject: Re: LibH or Anaconda ?? Message-ID: <20040527143146.41320.qmail@web90104.mail.scd.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <200405262039.28752.david@usermode.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David Johnson <david@usermode.org> wrote: Except that there is absolutely no reason to use RPM! We already have our own package format that does everything RPM does and more. And without several of the disadvantages. Converting Anaconda's Perl scripts to use the pkg tools instead of rpm should be a rather trivial. The major problems are elsewhere. -- David Johnson ___________________ http://www.usermode.org Well , the anaconda is not a set of scripts of Perl , but Python , they look alike , but are different. So , if the package format has already been decided and coded into anaconda , what else is so important ? --------------------------------- Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping" your friends today! Download Messenger Now
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040527143146.41320.qmail>