Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 31 May 2006 00:23:04 +0400 (MSD)
From:      Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru>
To:        Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
Cc:        Matteo Riondato <matteo@FreeBSD.org>, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, linimon@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/tools/tools/recoverdisk Makefile recoverdisk.c
Message-ID:  <20060531001204.O69922@mp2.macomnet.net>
In-Reply-To: <20060530200425.GA16937@soaustin.net>
References:  <200605301910.k4UJAIMw054372@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060530232844.W69922@mp2.macomnet.net> <20060530193804.GH29390@kaiser.sig11.org> <20060530235134.I69922@mp2.macomnet.net> <20060530200425.GA16937@soaustin.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 30 May 2006, 15:04-0500, Mark Linimon wrote:

> On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 11:53:50PM +0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
> > That's something new for me.  Mark, is it possible to mail them to
> > freebsd-bugs as well?
>
> Not easily possible (it just mails to the default assignee).  Further, I'm
> not sure that increasing the traffic on -bugs even _more_ is advisable, it's
> pretty near impossible to drink from the firehose as it is.
>
> If people see things on -${ARCH} that should be in 'kern' they should fix
> them up.  I don't subscribe to those lists and thus don't often work on
> those PR (just once every month or so; to work on the -i386 PRs takes some,
> er, liquid courage to go tackle.)

Categories are ofter misfilled and sometimes bugs in the PRs are arch
independent.  As far as I see a volume of non-i386 bugs is not big: at
the moment we have 22 sparc64, 100+ amd64, 3 ia64, 3 powerpc, 13
alpha PRs.  Arm is bugless.

On the other hand it not feasible to subscribe to all our arches lists
just to get PRs.

-- 
Maxim Konovalov



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060531001204.O69922>