Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 08:00:41 -0400 From: Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.0 release date and stability Message-ID: <CDEF9AB2-5655-4615-B8B9-D71A61F3B3E0@khera.org> In-Reply-To: <200510202217.07999.lofi@freebsd.org> References: <200510152346.RAA20742@lariat.net> <20051019231046.1136a1ea.dick@nagual.st> <57B3E41C-8880-4ED4-B33C-321DE5ED9AD1@khera.org> <200510202217.07999.lofi@freebsd.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Oct 20, 2005, at 4:16 PM, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > On Thursday, 20. October 2005 21:20, Vivek Khera wrote: > > >> personally, I don't see the point of doing that. just let your ports >> naturally get replaced as they are upgraded due to version bumps and >> such. >> > > That is dangerous, see other replies in this thread for the reasons > why. I stand corrected; you need to update any provider of shared object libs at the minimum. Probably also any consumer of those shared objects too.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CDEF9AB2-5655-4615-B8B9-D71A61F3B3E0>