Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 23:40:48 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] cross-arch bootstrapping is broken by GCC 3.1 Message-ID: <20020514234048.A50389@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20020515063110.GA78035@sunbay.com>; from ru@FreeBSD.org on Wed, May 15, 2002 at 09:31:11AM %2B0300 References: <20020514120758.D31896@dragon.nuxi.com> <20020515130406.S6466-100000@gamplex.bde.org> <20020514210705.A36814@dragon.nuxi.com> <20020515063110.GA78035@sunbay.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 09:31:11AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > I insist we should officially support upgrading from X.any to X+1.0-R, > minimally. You need to either get concensis from arch@ or core@ then. > This actually doesn't affect only cross-arch case, the subject is wrong. > It affects any arch with HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT > HOST_BITS_PER_LONG e.g. > alpha. Forget about 4.x for a moment and imagine you have a pre-atoll(3) > 5.0-CURRENT alpha (atoll(3) was committed on 2001/11/28). If this is true, then I agree we have a problem. I'll look into it. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020514234048.A50389>