Date: Sat, 7 May 2016 09:46:03 +0200 From: Ben Woods <woodsb02@gmail.com> To: Glen Barber <gjb@freebsd.org> Cc: "Ngie Cooper (yaneurabeya)" <yaneurabeya@gmail.com>, "freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org" <freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: NO_INSTALLEXTRAKERNELS and PkgBase Message-ID: <CAOc73CCE0j3D05tu_1nnjtYEL8=Jk9nMGeMzjeDKaGgW=71ohQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20160507074159.GC47527@FreeBSD.org> References: <CAOc73CC6WoFHPDBa6LGMyhmnA1ZjiemffyTJBGBNSZwPOu8KzA@mail.gmail.com> <20160506221151.GN1362@FreeBSD.org> <CAOc73CACQUhx2rGuC1ftcpuk=LeOv8fEpnR0A2PPRGVo31RYRg@mail.gmail.com> <7018EDCD-A567-446D-965C-9E886D543238@gmail.com> <20160507074159.GC47527@FreeBSD.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 7 May 2016 at 09:41, Glen Barber <gjb@freebsd.org> wrote: > I think this raises a larger question - did "something" change that > otherwise violates POLA? The commit recently was intended to revert > a POLA violation, so maybe I am not entirely clear on what branch this > affects. > > Are we talking about head or stable/10 here? > > Glen > I am talking about head, which no longer installs/packages multiple kernels by default. https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/Makefile.inc1?revision=299088&view=markup Whilst the r299088 commit is referring to a stable POLA violation, the commit itself is a change to head with a proposed MFC after 3 days. Its interesting, because this has surprised me when testing PkgBase on head, as the behaviour has changed from the initial announcement. Regards, Benhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAOc73CCE0j3D05tu_1nnjtYEL8=Jk9nMGeMzjeDKaGgW=71ohQ>