Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 10:20:01 +0000 From: Rasputin <rasputin@submonkey.net> To: "Jeffrey J. Mountin" <jeff-ml@mountin.net> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /etc/make.conf question Message-ID: <20020313102001.A2332@shikima.mine.nu> In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.20020312135845.0369fc20@207.227.119.2>; from jeff-ml@mountin.net on Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 02:07:00PM -0600 References: <20020312114158.A92910@blackhelicopters.org> <Pine.GSO.4.32.0203121126520.1546-100000@nippur.irb.hr> <20020312074349.A91204@blackhelicopters.org> <20020312155618.GA9463@raggedclown.net> <20020312114158.A92910@blackhelicopters.org> <shk7sha9n2.7sh@localhost.localdomain> <4.3.2.20020312135845.0369fc20@207.227.119.2>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Jeffrey J. Mountin <jeff-ml@mountin.net> [020312 20:09]: > At 11:06 AM 3/12/02 -0800, Gary W. Swearingen wrote: > >Michael Lucas <mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org> writes: > > > > > Remember, the correct dance for an upgrade these days includes the > > following: > > > > > > make buildworld > > > make buildkernel > > > make installkernel > > > <reboot, single-user> > > > make installworld > > > mergemaster > > > <reboot> > >I replace the second two steps with "make kernel". > >I'd be glad to know any disadvantage of that not shared by the two-step. > Besides the fact that your modules are stale (make.conf change required to > avoid that) or that you are on your own when doing "unsupported" > procedures. Really? I'm sure it's just 'buildkernel installkernel', therefore the installkernel target should only run in buildkernel succeeds. -- Die, v.: To stop sinning suddenly. -- Elbert Hubbard Rasputin :: Jack of All Trades - Master of Nuns :: To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020313102001.A2332>