Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2002 11:06:09 +0100 From: Ian Dowse <iedowse@maths.tcd.ie> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: FreeBSD current users <current@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: KSE status report Message-ID: <200207021106.aa15257@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 02 Jul 2002 01:57:39 PDT." <Pine.BSF.4.21.0207020054590.94626-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.BSF.4.21.0207020054590.94626-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>, Ju lian Elischer writes: >The big problem at the moment is that something in the >source tree as a whole, and probably something that came in with KSE >is stopping us from successfully compiling a working libc_r. >(a bit ironic really). Is the new (elm)->field.tqe_next = (void *)-1; in TAILQ_REMOVE a likely candidate? That could easily tickle old bugs in other code. The libc_r code does use a lot of TAILQ macros. Ian To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200207021106.aa15257>