Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 15:57:12 -0500 From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> To: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: explicit use of /etc/rc.d vs service Message-ID: <CAF6rxgnHvLgz3NKoN=M=TE2Z99haTViTWL39xS3YggMb6rn-og@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1301241308520.84905@wonkity.com> References: <CAF6rxgnJPFevO7W%2BypBZdcL7deB%2B_cQHF0AEcVaWWv8FFhcNcQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1301240835180.82165@wonkity.com> <CAF6rxgnCEc_7tO9QzMPuEuMr1cOBXO-_BU8oouG3J-Jv7MkeqQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1301241308520.84905@wonkity.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 24 January 2013 15:13, Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> wrote: > I did not look at this in detail, but would suggest that the unquoted > rc.conf examples should be quoted as the preferred form: I will not comment on the discussion between Chris and you, other than to say: no matter the result, it will not change *this* diff which serves only to deal with service(1) vs an explicit path statement. -- Eitan Adler
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxgnHvLgz3NKoN=M=TE2Z99haTViTWL39xS3YggMb6rn-og>