Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 22:42:19 +0100 From: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@FreeBSD.org> To: Martin Matuska <mm@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r219374 - in head/contrib/gcc: . config/i386 doc Message-ID: <20110307214219.GA6472@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201103071448.p27EmNrp038046@svn.freebsd.org> References: <201103071448.p27EmNrp038046@svn.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 02:48:23PM +0000, Martin Matuska wrote: > Author: mm > Date: Mon Mar 7 14:48:22 2011 > New Revision: 219374 > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/219374 > > Log: > Backport Intel Core 2 and AMD Geode CPU types from gcc-4.3 (GPLv2) > These options are supported in this shape in all newer GCC versions. > > PR: gnu/155308 > Obtained from: gcc 4.3 (rev. 118090, 118973, 120846; GPLv2) > MFC after: 2 weeks is the MFC actually safe without the newer binutils being merged as well? just wondering....
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110307214219.GA6472>