Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2016 11:50:55 -0700 From: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com> To: Garrett Cooper <ngie@FreeBSD.org> Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable-9@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r301681 - stable/9/sys/rpc Message-ID: <201606081850.u58IotT0022829@slippy.cwsent.com> In-Reply-To: Message from Garrett Cooper <ngie@FreeBSD.org> of "Wed, 08 Jun 2016 18:23:33 -0000." <201606081823.u58INXvL053444@repo.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <201606081823.u58INXvL053444@repo.freebsd.org>, Garrett Cooper write s: > Author: ngie > Date: Wed Jun 8 18:23:33 2016 > New Revision: 301681 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/301681 > > Log: > MFstable/10 r301680: > > MFC r300625: Why MFC to stable/10 and then to stable/9. Doesn't that make stable/10 stable/9's ancestor? When stable/9 was first branched,HEAD was its ancestor. Doesn't this cause confusing ancestry in the branch? -- Cheers, Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com> or <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com> FreeBSD UNIX: <cy@FreeBSD.org> Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201606081850.u58IotT0022829>