Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 13:06:33 +0100 From: Stijn Hoop <stijn@win.tue.nl> To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: make release without a lot of the base system Message-ID: <20030327120633.GN93053@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> In-Reply-To: <20030327115428.GF98283@madman.celabo.org> References: <20030327111440.GJ93053@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> <20030327115428.GF98283@madman.celabo.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --]
On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 05:54:28AM -0600, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 12:14:40PM +0100, Stijn Hoop wrote:
> > First, should even kerberos be built with the NO* options above?
>
> No, it should not. Defining NOCRYPT or NO_OPENSSL will prevent the
> kerberosIV directory from being entered during the build.
It did, see below. I was mistakenly assuming that the build failed in
the buildworld phase of make release.
> [...]
> > Second, I have tried adding MAKE_KERBEROS4=no to make.conf but that doesn't
> > appear to make a difference. What's the correct option in /etc/make.conf to
> > skip building kerberos 4 and 5?
>
> Don't do that. The correct option is not to define MAKE_KERBEROS[45]
> at all. The value does not matter ... if it is defined, it will be
> read as `make it please'.
That's what I found out the hard way :)
> I would guess that your flags aren't getting propogated as you think.
> *shrug*
Yes that was my first guess as well but I've verified that those are
the contents of my <chroot>/etc/make.conf. make *is* being run inside
the chroot, is it not? Or is it started from the outside?
After some digging I do see this however, from src/release/Makefile:
release.3:
[snip]
.if exists(${.CURDIR}/../kerberosIV) && exists(${.CURDIR}/../crypto) && !defined
(NOKERBEROS)
cd ${.CURDIR}/..; \
${CROSSMAKE} ${WORLD_FLAGS} -DNO_MAKEDB_RUN -DMAKE_KERBEROS4 \
SUBDIR_OVERRIDE="kerberosIV ${K4PROGS}" \
buildworld distributeworld DISTDIR=${RD}/trees
.endif
and that corresponds to the logs, after rechecking, so not having NOKERBEROS
appears to be the source of my trouble.
I'm now retrying with NOKERBEROS=true in my release make.conf, will let
you know when it's done.
Thanks,
--Stijn
--
"Coca-Cola is solely responsible for ensuring that people - too stupid to know
not to tip half-ton machines on themselves - are safe. Forget parenting - the
blame is entirely on the corporation for designing machines that look so
innocent and yet are so deadly."
-- http://www.kuro5hin.org/?op=displaystory;sid=2001/10/28/212418/42
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQE+gulJY3r/tLQmfWcRApUcAJ9aZHQ4VdQhjb5zYA/PkW6srcVzQwCgikSe
7vHXglh3wJQolfoZZoh3Rn4=
=Nf11
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030327120633.GN93053>