Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 18:47:53 +0100 From: Michael Moll <kvedulv@kvedulv.de> To: Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de> Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, kvedulv@kvedulv.de, Jeff Roberson <jeff@freebsd.org>, Kirk McKusick <mckusick@mckusick.com>, Gavin Atkinson <gavin@freebsd.org>, Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn@freebsd.org>, svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r219667 - head/usr.sbin/bsdinstall/partedit Message-ID: <20110321174753.GB32285@darkthrone.kvedulv.de> In-Reply-To: <20110320162212.GI1606@alchemy.franken.de> References: <4D840BD0.4030306@freebsd.org> <201103200000.p2K00pue003373@chez.mckusick.com> <20110320162212.GI1606@alchemy.franken.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi All, On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 05:22:12PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote: > I fear it's still a bit premature for enable SU+J by default. Rather > recently I was told about a SU+J filesystems lost after a panic > that happend after snapshotting it (report CC'ed, maybe he can > provide some more details) and I'm pretty sure I've seen the problem > described in PR 149022 also after the potential fix mentioned in its > feedback. Sorry, no details available, as I didn't record the panic and problems back then. However this was not the first panic which I attribute (maybe wrongly) to SUJ and as an consequence now all my UFS filesystems have SUJ turned off again. If SUJ really is going to be the default I would expact quite some fallout from this after my experiences. Kind Regards -- Michael Moll
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110321174753.GB32285>