Date: Fri, 29 Nov 1996 15:47:56 +1100 From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: bde@zeta.org.au, phk@critter.tfs.com Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: users of "ft" tapes, please test! Message-ID: <199611290447.PAA13253@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>I have been thinking about un-inlining spls. This saves 29K out of >I generally use the rule of thumb that unless the text-size is >smaller as a result, then inlining is wrong. A good rule, I think. Of course it is wrong if the code is in a tight loop, but that isn't common. I think the inlines for min(), etc. break this rule. There aren't many inlines that follow it. E.g,. the inline spltty(), which is approximately only 2 C instructions (save = cpl; cpl |= tty_imask;) is twice as large as the non-inline version. Bruce
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199611290447.PAA13253>